SELECTION OF DEFINING CONTRASTS IN TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS.GREENFIELD AA.1976; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 1; PP. 64-67; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

THE MEAN EFFICIENCY OF BLOCK DESIGNS.GNOT S.1976; MATH. OPER.-FORSCH. STATIST.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 75-84; ABS. ALLEM. RUSSE; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ON AUGMENTED DESIGNS.FEDERER WT; RAGHAVARAO D.1975; BIOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 29-35; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

LARGE SAMPLE STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR AN UNUSUAL PARTIALLY NESTED DESIGN.GAMES PA.1977; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 3; PP. 36-37; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

MINIMUM FULL SEQUENCES OF 2^N-M RESOLUTION III PLANS.PAJAK TF; ADDELMAN S.1975; J. R. STATIST. SOC., B; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 88-95; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ON PATTERNS OF EFFICIENCY-BALANCED DESIGNS.PURI PD; NIGAM AK.1975; J. R. STATIST. SOC., B; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 37; NO 3; PP. 457-458; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE NUMBER OF NON-ZERO POST HOC CONTRASTS FROM ANOVA AND ERROR-RATE I.RODGER RS.1975; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 71-78; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

SOME SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE BOUNDS IN NORMAL MODELS WITH RESTRICTED ALTERNATIVES.MARCUS R; PERITZ E.1976; J.R. STATIST. SOC., B; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 157-165; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

THE BERRY-ESSEEN BOUND FOR MINIMUM CONTRAST ESTIMATORS IN THE INDEPENDENT NOT IDENTICALLY DISTRIBUTED CASE.PRAKASA RAO BLS.1975; METRIKA; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 225-239; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

CONTRAST ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS.FREUND RA.1974; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 2-21; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

SIGNIFICANCE TESTING IN MULTIPLE STATISTICAL INFERENCE.SVERDRUP E.1976; SCAND. J. STATIST.; SWED.; DA. 1976; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 73-78; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

LANG. ENGHOLLINGSWORTH H.1978; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 4; PP. 4-6; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SELECTION OF DEFINING CONTRASTS IN TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS. A MODIFICATION.GREENFELD AA.1978; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 78; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

THE RATIONALE OF SCHEFFE'S METHOD AND THE SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDUREBOIK RJ.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 49-56; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

USE OF INTER-BLOCK INFORMATION TO OBTAIN UNIFORMLY BETTER ESTIMATORS OF TREATMENT CONTRASTSMEJZA S.1978; MATH. OPER.-FORSCH. STATIST., STATIST.; DDR; DA. 1978; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 335-341; ABS. GER/RUS; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

IMPROVING SOME MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURESFELZENBAUM A; HART S; HOCHBERG Y et al.1983; ANNALS OF STATISTICS; ISSN 0090-5364; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 121-128; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

ON PARTITIONING MEANS INTO GROUPSCOX DR; SPJOTVOLL E.1982; SCAND. J. STAT.; ISSN 0303-6898; SWE; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 147-152; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

FURTHER TABLES OF THE STUDENTIZED MAXIMUM MODULUS DISTRIBUTIONURY HK; STOLINE MR; MITCHELL BT et al.1980; COMMUNIC. STATIST., SIMUL. COMPUT.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 167-178; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

TREATMENT CONTRASTS IN PAIRED COMPARISONS: LARGE-SAMPLE RESULTS, APPLICATION, AND SOME OPTIMAL DESIGNSEL HELBAWY AT; BRADLEY RA.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 364; PP. 831-839; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SELECTION OF DEFINING CONTRASTS AND CONFOUNDED EFFECTS IN TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS.FRANKLIN MF; BAILEY RA.1977; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 321-326; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ON THE T-METHOD OF MULTIPLE-COMPARISON.MARGARITESCU E.1976; REV. ROUMAINE MATH. PURES APPL.; ROUMAN.; DA. 1976; VOL. 21; NO 8; PP. 1063-1069; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A TYPE OF ORTHOGONAL CONTRASTS FOR UNBALANCED DATALI CC; SATI MAZUMDAR.1981; BIOMETR. Z.; ISSN 0006-3452; DDR; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 7; PP. 645-651; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

A CONCISE FORMULA TO COMPUTE GENERAL ORTHOGONAL CONTRAST COEFFICIENTSACKERMANN H.1979; BIOMETR. J.; DDR; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 7; PP. 597-606; ABS. GER; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF MEAN SEPARATION TECHNIQUES.PETERSEN MR; BUTCHER DF; WEARDEN S et al.1978; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 33-54; BIBL. 1 P.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE MODIFIED-TUKEY AND SCHEFFE METHODS OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR PAIRWISE CONTRASTS.KESELMAN HJ; ROGAN JC.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 361; PP. 47-52; BIBL. 25 REF.Article